Title: Optional

Text: Is personal choice a valid moral justification for an atrocious act committed against a victim? That is, if someone harms a victim, was it morally okay to do so just because it was the abuser's personal choice to do so? No, of course not. Personal preference can't justify anything when a victim is involved. So then I ask: why do people use this as an excuse when confronted with the fact that they pay for animals to be needlessly abused for the flavor of their bodies? Each paragraph will be a test.

Save test: Use this if you want to share this typing test (only for authenticated users).