हालका कमेन्टहरू
based on a course I am studying
I'd love to tell you more, but I don't really understand what you mean by …
arjun bhattrai
This is the second quote in a row I've gotten about parallel universes... are they …
Anonn
thanks for the new pb
Jalia Estevez
awwww that's so sweet!!! Thanks, really needed to hear this today.
unkown
I feel like I have the same issue. For a long time during my childhood, …
थप
English
Français (French)
Español (Spanish)
Português (Portuguese)
Italian (Italiano)
Svenska (Swedish)
Deutsch (German)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
हिंदी (Hindi)
Pусский (Russian)
Dansk (Danish)
বাংলা (Bengali)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Eestlane (Estonian)
ελληνικά (Greek)
čeština (Czech)
Polish (Polski)
Hrvatski (Croatian)
Română (Romanian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
한국어, 조선어 (Korean)
Türkçe (Turkish)
中文 (Chinese)
Suomi (Finnish)
српски језик (Serbian)
Українська мова (Ukrainian)
norsk språk (Norwegian)
српски језик (Hebrew)
schweizerdeutsche sprache (Swiss-German)
नेपाली (Nepali)
ภาษาไทย (Siamese)
Lingua Latina (Latin)
ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱞᱤ (Santali)
日本語 (Japanese)
bebert's उद्धारणहरू
Daniel Pennac
- Comme un roman
Le vingtième siècle trop "visuel" ? Le dix-neuvième trop descriptif ? Et pourquoi pas le dix-huitième trop rationnel, le dix-septième trop classique, le seizième trop renaissance, Pouchkine trop russe et Sophocle trop mort ? Comme si les relations entre l'homme et le livre avaient besoin de siècles pour s'espacer.